A study of the effectiveness of nucleos(t)ide analogues in the treatment of HBeAg- positive chronic hepatitis B with normal alanine aminotransferase and high level of HBV DNA / 中华肝脏病杂志

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of nucleos(t)ide analogues in the treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B with normal alanine aminotransferase and high level of HBV DNA. Methods: Treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients who were followed up at the Center of Infectious Diseases, West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2019 to January 2020 were selected as subjects. Demographic characteristics, the results of laboratory examination before treatment and one year after treatment were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into tenofovir dipivoxil (TDF) and propofol fumurate tenofovir (TAF) treatment group according to different types of medication. The changes of serum HBV DNA level, HBeAg serological conversion and HBsAg quantitative level were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 38 cases were enrolled. Among them, there were 16 and 22 cases in the TDF and TAF group, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in demographic characteristics, baseline HBV DNA levels and HBsAg quantitative levels between the two groups. Virological response was achieved in 60.5% (23/38) of patients after one year of antiviral therapy. Serum HBV DNA levels below the lower limit of detection [68.2% (15/22) vs. 50.0% (8/16), P=0.258] and higher HBeAg seroconversion rate [18.2%] (4/22) vs. 6.3% (1/16), P=0.374] was obtained in TAF than TDF group; however, there was no statistically significant differences between the two. Serum HBsAg quantitative level was significantly reduced with TDF and TAF treatment. In addition, alanine aminotransferase elevation was reduced in TAF than TDF treated group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that patient age was an independent predictor of a virological response to antiviral therapy. Conclusion: HBeAg-positive CHB patients with normal alanine aminotransferase, and high HBV DNA level can obtain better curative effect after TDF and TAF treatment.

Tenofovir vs. entecavir on recurrence of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma beyond Milan criteria after hepatectomy / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

BACKGROUND@#Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond the Milan criteria is shown to be beneficial. However, a high rate of post-operative HCC recurrence hinders the long-term survival of the patients. This study aimed to investigate and compare the impacts of tenofovir (TDF) and entecavir (ETV) on the recurrence of hepatitis B viral (HBV)-related HCC beyond the Milan criteria.@*METHODS@#Data pertaining to 1532 patients who underwent hepatectomy and received antiviral therapy between January 2014 and January 2019 were collected from five centers. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to determine prognostic factors for HCC recurrence.@*RESULTS@#The analysis incorporates 595 HBV-related HCC patients. The overall 5-year RFS was 21.3%. Among them, 533 and 62 patients received ETV and TDF treatment, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates were 46.3%, 27.4%, and 19.6%, respectively, in the ETV group compared with 65.1%, 41.8%, and 37.2%, respectively, in the TDF group (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that TDF treatment (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.604, P = 0.005), cirrhosis (HR: 1.557, P = 0.004), tumor size (HR: 1.037, P = 0.008), microvascular invasion (MVI) (HR: 1.403, P = 0.002), portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) (HR: 1.358, P = 0.012), capsular invasion (HR: 1.228, P = 0.040), and creatinine levels (CREA) (HR: 0.993, P = 0.031) were statistically significant prognostic factors associated with RFS.@*CONCLUSIONS@#Patients with HCC beyond the Milan criteria exhibited a high rate of HCC recurrence after hepatectomy. Compared to the ETV therapy, TDF administration significantly lowered the risk of HCC recurrence.

Low-level viremia in nucleoside analog-treated chronic hepatitis B patients / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

Low-level viremia (LLV) was defined as persistent or intermittent episodes of detectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA (<2000 IU/mL, detection limit of 10 IU/mL) after 48 weeks of antiviral treatment. Effective antiviral therapies for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients, such as entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), have been shown to inhibit the replication of HBV DNA and prevent liver-related complications. However, even with long-term antiviral therapy, there are still a number of patients with persistent or intermittent LLV. At present, the research on LLV to address whether adversely affect the clinical outcome is limited, and the follow-up treatment for these patients is open to question. At the same time, the mechanism of LLV is not clear. In this review, we summarize the incidence of LLV, the association between LLV and long-term outcomes, possible mechanisms, and management strategies in these patient populations.

Efectividad y seguridad del esquema genérico lamivudina/tenofovir y efavirenz en pacientes con VIH/SIDA naïve: estudio fase IV no aleatorizado, Cali-Colombia 2012-2014 / Effectiveness and safety of generic version of lamivudine/tenofovir and efavirenz in treatment naïve HIV-infected patients: a nonrandomized, open-label, phase IV study in Cali-Colombia, 2012-2014

Resumen Antecedentes: Los estudios clínicos orientados a evaluar la calidad de medicamentos genéricos pueden ser útiles para fortalecer políticas de acceso a terapia anti-retroviral combinada (TARc). Objetivo: Describir la efectividad y seguridad del esquema genérico lamivudina/tenofovir/efavirenz (3TC/TDF/EFV) en pacientes con infección por VIH/SIDA naïve, pertenecientes a un programa de atención integral. Materiales/Métodos: Estudio clínico prospectivo fase IV abierto y sin grupo control. Entre 2012-2014, se incluyeron y siguieron 40 pacientes con infección por VIH/SIDA naïve y con indicación para iniciar tratamiento. Los pacientes fueron tratados con el esquema genérico 3TC/TDF/EFV y fueron seguidos durante 12 meses. El seguimiento incluyó valoración clínica, parámetros inmunovirológicos y de laboratorio, al inicio del tratamiento y a los 3, 6 y 12 meses. Resultados: De los 40 pacientes, 30 (75%) cumplieron los doce meses de tratamiento; de ellos, 80% alcanzó CV indetectable (< 40 copias/mL) y 83,3% CV < 50 copias/mL. Adicionalmente, en el grupo hubo un incremento en la mediana de 173 linfocitos TCD4/mm3. Por su parte, los resultados del hemograma completo, creatininemia y transaminasas hepáticas se conservaron en rangos normales y no generaron cambios del TARc. Los efectos adversos reconocidos para estos medicamentos se presentaron en menos de 10% de los pacientes y no tuvieron implicaciones graves. Conclusiones: En este grupo pequeño de pacientes, el esquema genérico 3TC/TDF/EFV es efectivo y seguro en el tratamiento de pacientes con infección por VIH/SIDA naïve, y su perfil de efectividad y seguridad es similar al del esquema 3TC/TDF/EFV innovador en pacientes con condiciones clínicas similares.

Background: Clinical studies aimed to evaluating the quality of generic drugs may be useful to strengthen policies of access to combined antiretroviral therapy (cART). Aim: To describe the effectiveness and safety of the generic schema lamivudine/tenofovir/efavirenz (3TC/TDF/EFV) in patients with HIV/AIDS naive, belonging to a comprehensive care program. Methods: A nonrandomized, open-label, phase IV study, during 2012 to 2014 naive HIV-infected patients 18 years or older with indication to receive cART were recruited. Patients were treated with generic scheme 3TC/TDF/EFV and were followed-up during 12 months. Clinical, immunological and laboratory parameters were assessed at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months of treatment. Results: Of the 40 patients, 30 (75%) met the 12 months of treatment; of them, 80% achieved undetectable viral load (< 40 copies/mL) and 83.3% viral load < 50 copies/mL. Additionally, there was a significant increase (173 cells/mm3) in the median for CD4 T lymphocyte count. Moreover, the results of the whole blood count, creatinine and transaminases were preserved in normal ranges and did not generate changes in the cART. Potential side effects of antiretroviral drugs occurred in less than 10% of patients and had no serious implications. Conclusions: In this small group of patients, the generic scheme 3TC/TDF/EFV is effective and safe in the treatment of patients with HIV/AIDS naïve, and its effectiveness and safety profile is similar to show by innovator scheme 3TC/TDF/EFV in patients with similar clinical conditions. Registro Estudio: Registro Público Cubano de Ensayos Clínicos (RPCEC) ID: RPCEC00000134. Registered 20 July 2012.

Costo-efectividad de dos terapias antivirales para Hepatitis B crónica en el Perú: Entecavir y tenofovir / Cost-Fffectiveness of Two Antiviral Therapies for Chronic Hepatitis B in Peru: Entecavir and Tenofovir

RESUMEN Objetivos Comparar en términos de costo-efectividad a entecavir (ETV) y tenofovir (TDF) en el tratamiento del virus de la hepatitis B (HBV) en hospitales públicos del Perú. Materiales y métodos Estructuramos un modelo de Markov, definimos la efectividad en años de vida ajustados a calidad (AVAC). Incluimos los costos directos del tratamiento en soles desde la perspectiva del Ministerio de Salud del Perú. Calculamos la relación entre costo y efectividad incrementales (ICER). Realizamos análisis de sensibilidad determinístico y probabilístico, considerando un rango de disponibilidad de pago (WTP) desde uno hasta tres veces el producto bruto interno (PBI) per-cápita, y el beneficio monetario neto (BMN) o ICER en el caso del análisis de tornado. Resultados El tratamiento con TDF es más efectivo y menos costoso que ETV. El ETV tuvo un costo por AVAC de S/ 4482, y de S/ 1526 para TDF. El TDF mantiene un BMN progresivamente mayor conforme aumenta la WTP. La tasa de descuento fue la única variable con efecto significativo en la incertidumbre del modelo. Conclusiones El tratamiento con TDF es más costo-efectivo que ETV en hospitales públicos del Perú.

ABSTRACT Objetives To compare in terms of cost-effectiveness to entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir (TDF) in the treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in public hospitals in Peru. Materials and methods We structured a Markov model. We define effectiveness adjusted life years for quality (QALY). We include the direct costs of treatment in soles from the perspective of the Ministry of Health of Peru. We estimate the relationship between cost and effectiveness ratios (ICER). We performed sensitivity analyzes considering a range of willingness to pay (WTP) from one to three times the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita, and a tornado analysis regarding Monetary Net Profit (BMN) or ICER. Results Treatment with TDF is more effective and less expensive than ETV. The ETV had a cost per QALY of PEN 4482, and PEN 1526 TDF. The PTO maintains a progressively larger with increasing WTP BMN. The discount rate was the only variable with a significant effect on model uncertainty. Conclusion Treatment with TDF is more cost-effective than ETV in public hospitals in Peru.

Tenofovir associado a entricitabina (TDF/FTC 300/200mg) como profilaxia pré-exposição (PrEP) para populações sob maior risco de adquirir o vírus da imunodeficiência humana (HIV) / Tenofovir associated with emtricitabine (TDF / FTC 300 / 200mg) as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for populations at increased risk of acquiring human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)

CONTEXTO: A resposta brasileira à epidemia de aids é resultante de um longo processo de atuação do governo brasileiro que garante desde 1996 acesso universal ao tratamento antirretroviral. Contudo, apesar dos inúmeros avanços ocorridos na redução da morbimortalidade nos últimos anos, o número de novos casos de aids vem se mantendo praticamente inalterado. No Brasil, a epidemia de aids é concentrada em determinados segmentos populacionais, que apresentam uma maior prevalência de infecção pelo HIV, quando comparados à população em geral, e respondem pela maioria de casos novos da infecção. Assim, para essas populações sob maior risco de infecção pelo HIV faz-se necessário a construção de estratégias de prevenção focalizadas como forma de impactar a epidemia. TECNOLOGIA: Profilaxia pré-exposição (PrEP) oral, na forma de tenofovir associado a entricitabina (TDF/FTC 300/200mg). Consiste no uso de antirretrovirais previamente à exposição de risco. INDICAÇÃO: Redução de risco em adquirir a infecção pelo HIV, entre pessoas sob risco aumentado. PERGUNTA: O uso de tenofovir associado a entricitabina (TDF/FTC 300/200mg) quando comparado ao uso de placebo reduz o risco de infecção pelo HIV entre pessoas sob alto risco? EVIDÊNCIAS CIENTÍFICAS: As evidências científicas disponíveis demostram que o uso de PrEP reduz o risco de infecção pelo HIV, comparado a placebo, com eficácia >70% (RR=0,30, 95% IC: 0,21-0,45, p= 0,001). Sua eficácia está diretamente relacionada à adesão ao medicamento. Os eventos adversos foram similares entre o grupo placebo e o que usou PrEP. Casos de resistência aos medicamentos foram encontrados entre aqueles que iniciaram PrEP durante a fase aguda da infecção, mas a incidência de resistência durante o uso de PrEP foi baixa. Não foi encontrada associação entre uso de PrEP e mudanças no comportamento sexual. O uso de PrEP demonstrou segurança e eficácia, para a redução de risco em adquirir a infecção pelo HIV, entre pessoas sob risco aumentado, quando comparado ao uso de placebo. RECOMENDAÇÃO DA CONITEC: A CONITEC recomendou a incorporação da associação de tenofovir e entricitabina (TDF/FTC 300/200mg) como profilaxia pré-exposição (PrEP) para populações sob risco aumentado de infecção pelo HIV no SUS, condicionada à aprovação do registro na ANVISA para essa indicação e à apresentação de um plano de acompanhamento anual das pessoas que receberão a profilaxia, de forma que sua incorporação possa ser reavaliada dentro de um prazo de tempo de, no máximo, 2 anos. CONSULTA PÚBLICA: Por meio da Consulta Pública nº 05 foram recebidas 147 contribuições distribuídas entre os formulários destinados a experiência e opinião e os para contribuições técnico-científicas. O nível de concordância com a recomendação inicial favorável à incorporação do medicamento como profilaxia pré-exposição (prep) para populações sob risco aumentado de adquirir o vírus da imunodeficiência humana (HIV) no SUS foi alto, abrangendo quase a totalidade das contribuições técnico-científica e 77% das contribuições de experiência e opinião. Entre as discordantes ou parcialmente concordantes não foram identificadas contribuições que trouxessem evidências científicas novas às já incluídas nesse parecer técnico-científico ou contestações às evidências científicas identificadas e que embasam a proposta de incorporação do medicamento com finalidade profilática. A maioria das experiências profissionais relatadas convergem com a proposta de incorporação elaborada nesse parecer. RECOMENDAÇÃO FINAL: Deliberou-se por unanimidade recomendar a incorporação da associação de tenofovir e entricitabina (TDF/FTC 300/200mg) como profilaxia pré-exposição (prep) para populações sob risco aumentado de adquirir o vírus da imunodeficiência humana (HIV) no SUS, condicionada à aprovação da inclusão da indicação para profilaxia pré-exposição ao HIV no registro do medicamento pela ANVISA e reavaliação do plano de acompanhamento anual das pessoas que receberão a profilaxia, em até 2 anos. DECISÃO: Incorporar o tenofovir associado a entricitabina (TDF/FTC 300/200mg) como profilaxia pré-exposição (PrEP) para populações sob maior risco de adquirir o vírus da imunodeficiência humana (HIV), no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde ­ SUS, dada pela Portaria nº 21, publicada no DOU nº 101, do dia 29 de maio de 2017, seção 1, pág. 73.(AU)

Lamivudine, Entecavir, or Tenofovir Treatment of Hepatitis B Infection: Effects on Calcium, Phosphate, FGF23 and Indicators of Bone Metabolism

ABSTRACT Background. Patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) are often treated with nucleoside/nucleotide antiviral agents and metabolic bone toxicity is a possible concern. Objective. To determine the relationships between fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), a phosphaturic hormone, bone mineral density (BMD), and bone biochemical abnormalities in these patients. Material and methods. This is a cross-sectional observational study comparing HBV-infected subjects treated for at least one year with tenofovir (TDF), lamuvidine (LVD), entacavir (ETV), or not treated (CON). Patients with abnormalities in either calcium (Ca), phosphate (PO4), intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) or FGF23 were further evaluated with BMD by DXA. Results. No difference in liver enzymes or renal function seen among groups, but hypophosphatemia was seen in all groups with the highest incidence with TDF treatment (14%). FGF 23 levels were found to be elevated in 11.1% of TDF patients, 2.77% amongst controls. No elevations were found in the LVD or ETV groups. Among a subset of subjects (FGF23, PO4, and/or Ca abnormalities) who underwent further evaluation, 67% had insufficient 25-OH vitamin D, and 30% had elevated 24 h urinary Ca or PO4 excretion. No patients with FGF23 abnormalities had urine abnormalities. 40% had low DXA Z-score (<-2) at spine or hip but there was no difference between control and antiviral treatment groups and the mean FRAX score was 2.33% for major osteoporotic fractures and 0.29% for hip fracture. Conclusion. Abnormalities in bone metabolism, particularly involving vitamin D insufficiency, in HBV-treated subjects were observed with a small increased likelihood in TDF treated patients.

Avaliação econômica das abordagens terapêuticas para o tratamento das hepatites B e C: comparação das diretrizes nacionais e internacionais / Economic evaluation of therapeutic approaches for the treatment of hepatitis B and C: comparison of national and international guidelines

As hepatites virais B e C, nas últimas décadas, emergiram e se mantiveram em evidência como um grande problema de saúde pública. O desenvolvimento e a disseminação do uso de medicamentos antivirais vêm contribuindo para a diminuição da carga dessas infecções em nível individual e coletivo. Especialmente na última década, disponibilizaram-se tecnologias mais seguras e eficazes para o diagnóstico precoce e para o tratamento. No intuito de assegurar o uso racional desses insumos, muitos países elaboraram recomendações que incluem, os critérios de inclusão e exclusão para o tratamento e o estabelecimento do curso terapêutico. As recomendações nacionais e internacionais para o tratamento das hepatites B e C divergem em diversos aspectos, principalmente no que se refere aos fármacos eleitos como primeira linha de tratamento e ao público prioritário. No caso da hepatite C, o Ministério da Saúde brasileiro indica a terapia tripla somente para portadores de doença hepática avançada. O consenso internacional, representado pela OMS, pela AALSD e pelo NICE, assume direção oposta, ao propor como público prioritário, indivíduos com hepatite leve e moderada. As recomendações nacionais e internacionais para o tratamento da hepatite B se assemelham em grande medida, mas são conflitantes no que diz respeito aos medicamentos eleitos como primeira escolha. Com base nas divergências das diretrizes terapêuticas nacionais e internacionais, esse estudo objetivou confrontar as óticas nacionais e internacionais e avaliar as estratégias mais custo-efetivas para o tratamento contra o vírus da hepatite B (VHB) e o vírus da hepatite C (VHC) sob a perspectiva do SUS. Os resultados do modelo econômico construído indicam que o uso precoce e universal dos inibidores de protease (IPs) emerge como a conduta mais racional para o tratamento da hepatite C crônica na atualidade. Essa abordagem resulta em melhores desfechos clínicos e econômicos se comparada à terapia dual (peguinterferon + ribavirina) e ao uso de IPs no caso de refratariedade ao tratamento prévio e especialmente quando empregada restritamente aos casos de fibrose avançada, tal como recomendado pelas diretrizes nacionais. Na avaliação do custo-efetividade das recomendações terapêuticas para o tratamento contra o VHB em indivíduos HBeAg não reagentes, o uso do tenofovir se mostrou a estratégia mais eficiente. A terapia com tenofovir constitui a primeira linha de tratamento nas diretrizes nacionais atuais e foi a que apresentou maior efetividade associada ao menor custo global, contrariando as proposições de protocolos internacionais e de algumas publicações anteriores. Em síntese, a análise farmacoeconômica comparativa entre as diretrizes nacionais e internacionais para o tratamento das hepatites crônicas revela que a conduta de tratamento contra o VHB adotada no Brasil é adequada pelos pontos de vista clínico e econômico. Em contrapartida, as mesmas conclusões não se aplicam ao caso do tratamento da infecção do genótipo 1 da hepatite C, que, da forma como está sendo conduzido, penaliza uma parcela significativa dos indivíduos portadores, por oferecer o que há de mais avançado em tratamento antiviral exclusivamente aos pacientes com menores chances de resposta, maior risco de desenvolvimento de intolerância medicamentosa e já em estágio terminal da doença hepática

In the last decades, viral hepatitis B and C have emerged and have remained in evidence as a major public health problem. The development and dissemination of the use of antiviral drugs has contributed to reduce the burden of these infections at the individual and collective levels. Especially in the last decade, safer and more effective technologies have been made available for early diagnosis and treatment. In order to ensure the rational use of antivirals, many countries have developed recommendations that adds the inclusion and exclusion criterias for the treatment and establishment of the therapeutic course. National and international recommendations for the treatment of hepatitis B and C differ in several respects, especially for the drugs chosen as the first treatment line and for the priority public. In the case of hepatitis C, the Brazilian Ministry of Health indicates triple therapy only for patients with advanced liver disease. The international consensus, represented by WHO, AALSD and NICE, assumes the opposite direction proposing as a priority public, individuals with mild and moderate hepatitis. National and international recommendations for the treatment of Hepatitis B closely resemble each other but are in conflict with regard to medicines chosen as the first choice. Based on divergences among national and international therapeutic guidelines, this study aimed to compare national and international perspectives and to evaluate the most cost-effective strategies for the treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) from the SUS perspective. The results of the constructed economic model indicate that the early and universal use of protease inhibitors (PIs) emerges as the most rational conduct for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C today. This approach results in better clinical and economic outcomes compared to dual therapy (peginterferon + ribavirin) and the use of PIs in the case of refractoriness to previous treatment and especially when used strictly to cases of advanced fibrosis, as recommended by the national guidelines. In cost-effectiveness evaluation of the therapeutic recommendations for the treatment against HBV in non-reactive HBeAg individuals, the use of tenofovir was the most efficient strategy. In current national guidelines, tenofovir is recommended as the first-line treatment and was the one with the highest effectiveness associated with the lowest overall cost, contrary to the proposals of international protocols and some previous publications. In summary, the comparative pharmacoeconomic analysis between the national and international guidelines for the treatment of chronic hepatitis reveals that the treatment approach against HBV adopted in Brazil is adequate from the clinical and economic points of view. In contrast, the same conclusions do not apply to the treatment of hepatitis C genotype 1 infection, which, as it is being conducted, penalizes a significant portion of carriers because it offers the most advanced antiviral treatment exclusively to patients with lower chances of response, higher risk of developing drug intolerance and already in the terminal stage of liver disease

TeleCondutas: hepatite B / TeleGuides: Hepatitis B

As hepatite virais apresentam forma clínicas diversas, desde infecções assintomáticas até quadros de hepatopatia avançada, como cirrose e hepatocarcinoma. A equipe da atenção primária deve investigar pessoas com sinais e sintomas comuns da infecção, bem como assintomáticos que fazem parte do grupo de risco. Esta guia apresenta informação que orienta a conduta para casos de hepatite B no contexto da Atenção Primária à Saúde, incluindo: forma de transmissão, quadro clínico, suspeita ou diagnóstico de cirrose, diagnóstico de hepatite b, avaliação sorológica da hepatite b, avaliação de paciente com hepatite b aguda, avaliação de paciente com hepatite b crônica, rastreamento, vacina para hepatite b, encaminhamento para serviço especializado.

Efficacy of entecavir and tenofovir in chronic hepatitis B under treatment in the public health system in southern Brazil

There are about 350 million hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers worldwide and chronic HBV is considered a major public health problem. The objective of the present study was to assess the effectiveness of the nucleos(t)ide analogues tenofovir (TDF) and entecavir (ETV) in the treatment of chronic HBV. A cross-sectional study was carried out from March-December 2013, including all patients with chronic HBV, over 18 years of age, undergoing therapy through the public health system in southern Brazil. Only the data relating to the first treatments performed with TDF or ETV were considered. Retreatment, co-infection, transplanted or immunosuppressed patients were excluded. Six hundred and forty patients were evaluated, of which 336 (52.5%) received TDF and 165 (25.8%) ETV. The other 139 (21.7%) used various combinations of nucleos(t)ide analogues and were excluded. The negativation of viral load was observed in 87.3% and 78.8% and the negativation of hepatitis B e antigen was achieved in 79% and 72% of those treated with ETV or TDF, respectively. Negativation of hepatitis B surface antigen was not observed. There was no occurrence of adverse effects. This is a real-life study demonstrating that long-term treatment with ETV and TDF is both safe and effective.

Efficacy of switching from adefovir to tenofovir in chronic hepatitis B patients who exhibit suboptimal responses to adefovir-based combination rescue therapy due to resistance to nucleoside analogues (SATIS study)

BACKGROUND/AIMS: It remains to be determined whether switching from adefovir (ADV) to tenofovir (TDF) provides better virological outcomes in patients exhibiting suboptimal responses to ADV plus nucleoside analogue (ADV+NA) therapy for NA-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB). METHODS: In this prospective trial, patients who showed partial responses (defined as serum hepatitis B virus [HBV] DNA >60 IU/mL) to ADV+NA therapy for NA resistance were randomly allocated to receive TDF plus NA (TDF+NA group, n=16) or to continue their current therapy (ADV+NA group, n=16). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with complete virological response (CVR, defined as serum HBV DNA 2log10 IU/mL was more likely in the TDF+NA group at both 24 and 48 weeks (68.8% vs. 56.3%, P=0.014 vs. 81.3% vs. 56.3%, P=0.001, respectively). During the follow-up, the rate of HBeAg seroconversion was higher in the TDF+NA group than the ADV+NA group (12.5% vs. 6.25%, P=0.640), as was that for the hepatitis B surface antigen (6.25% vs. 0%, P=0.080). No serious adverse events due to antiviral agents occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In patients exhibiting suboptimal responses to ADV+NA therapy for NA-resistant CHB, switching from ADV to TDF might provide better virological outcomes.

Comparison of tenofovir plus lamivudine versus tenofovir monotherapy in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) exhibits similar antiviral efficacy against treatment-naïve and lamivudine (LAM)-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, there are few clinical reports on the antiviral effects of TDF-LAM combination therapy compared to TDF monotherapy in patients with LAM-resistant CHB. METHODS: We investigated the antiviral efficacy of TDF monotherapy vs. TDF-LAM combination therapy in 103 patients with LAM-resistant CHB. RESULTS: The study subjects were treated with TDF alone (n=40) or TDF-LAM combination therapy (n=63) for ≥6 months. The patients had previously been treated with TDF-based rescue therapy for a median of 30.0 months (range, 8-36 months). A virologic response (VR) was achieved in 99 patients (96.1%): 95.0% (38/40) of patients in the TDF monotherapy group and 96.8% (61/63) of patients in the TDF-LAM combination therapy group. The VR rates were not significantly different between the TDF monotherapy and TDF-LAM combination therapy groups (88.9 vs. 87.3% at month 12, and 94.4 vs. 93.7% at month 24, log-rank p=0.652). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that none of the pretreatment factors were significantly associated with VR. CONCLUSIONS: TDF monotherapy was as effective as TDF-LAM combination therapy for maintaining viral suppression in the vast majority of patients with LAM-resistant CHB, which suggests that TDF add-on therapy with LAM is unnecessary.

The efficacy of tenofovir-based therapy in patients showing suboptimal response to entecavir-adefovir combination therapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Before tenofovir (TDF) become available in South Korea, combination therapy with entecavir (ETV) and adefovir (ADV) was the most potent regimen for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who fail to respond to rescue therapy for drug resistance. We analyzed the efficacy of ETV-ADV combination therapy and investigated the clinical and clonal results of TDF-based rescue therapy in CHB patients refractory to this combination. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of CHB patients treated for up to 3 years with ETV-ADV combination therapy as a rescue therapy for drug resistance. In cases refractory to this combination, clinical and clonal analyses were performed for TDF-based rescue therapy. RESULTS: The analysis was performed on 48 patients. Twelve patients achieved a virological response (VR) within 3 years. A VR was subsequently achieved in nine of the ten patients without a VR who switched to TDF monotherapy. A VR was also achieved in six of the seven patients who switched to lamivudine-TDF combination therapy, and in two of the two patients who switched to ETV-TDF combination therapy. In an in vitro susceptibility test, viral replication was detected with TDF monotherapy but not with ETV-TDF combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of ETV-ADV combination therapy was insufficient in CHB patients who were refractory to rescue therapy. A more potent regimen such as ETV-TDF combination therapy may be considered in such refractory cases.

The efficacy of tenofovir-based therapy in patients showing suboptimal response to entecavir-adefovir combination therapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Before tenofovir (TDF) become available in South Korea, combination therapy with entecavir (ETV) and adefovir (ADV) was the most potent regimen for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who fail to respond to rescue therapy for drug resistance. We analyzed the efficacy of ETV-ADV combination therapy and investigated the clinical and clonal results of TDF-based rescue therapy in CHB patients refractory to this combination. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of CHB patients treated for up to 3 years with ETV-ADV combination therapy as a rescue therapy for drug resistance. In cases refractory to this combination, clinical and clonal analyses were performed for TDF-based rescue therapy. RESULTS: The analysis was performed on 48 patients. Twelve patients achieved a virological response (VR) within 3 years. A VR was subsequently achieved in nine of the ten patients without a VR who switched to TDF monotherapy. A VR was also achieved in six of the seven patients who switched to lamivudine-TDF combination therapy, and in two of the two patients who switched to ETV-TDF combination therapy. In an in vitro susceptibility test, viral replication was detected with TDF monotherapy but not with ETV-TDF combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of ETV-ADV combination therapy was insufficient in CHB patients who were refractory to rescue therapy. A more potent regimen such as ETV-TDF combination therapy may be considered in such refractory cases.

Proteinuria is common among HIV patients: what are we missing?

OBJECTIVES:HIV-related renal diseases are the leading causes of chronic kidney diseases worldwide. The present study aimed to investigate the prevalence of pathological proteinuria and its risk factors among HIV patients.METHODS:A review of the medical records of 666 HIV-infected individuals aged 18 years or older in an urban HIV/AIDS clinic based in Porto Alegre in southern Brazil. Overt proteinuria was defined as a protein-to-creatinine ratio greater than 150 mg/g according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes.RESULTS:The prevalence of pathological proteinuria in the present study cohort was 20%. Characteristics associated with pathological proteinuria after univariate analysis included alcohol abuse, hepatitis C virus coinfection, the occurrence of diabetes and therapy including tenofovir. Adjusted residuals analysis indicated an association between pathological proteinuria and both a CD4 lymphocyte count below 200 cells/mm3 and a viral load higher than 1000 copies/mL. Additionally, an absence of pathological proteinuria was associated with a CD4 lymphocyte count higher than 500 cells/mm3. After adjustment for variables with p<0.2 in the univariate analysis using a Poisson regression model, tenofovir-containing regimens and a CD4 lymphocyte count below 200 cells/mm3 were significantly associated with pathological proteinuria.CONCLUSION:The risk of chronic kidney diseases in this large contemporary cohort of HIV-infected individuals appeared to be attributable to a combination of HIV-related risk factors. In addition to the traditional risk factors cited in the literature, both regimens containing tenofovir and HIV disease severity seem to be associated with chronic kidney diseases in patients with HIV. Assessment of proteinuria constitutes a novel method for chronic kidney disease staging in HIV-infected individuals and may be effectively used to stratify the risk of progression to end-stage renal disease.

Urine alpha1-microglobulin is a better marker for early tubular dysfunction than beta2-microglobulin among tenofovir-exposed human immunodeficiency virus-infected men who have sex with men

Objectives: Men who have sex with men are at risk of tenofovir nephrotoxicity due to its wide use in both treatment and prophylaxis for human immunodeficiency virus infection, but little is known about the urinary biomarkers of early renal dysfunction in this population. This study aims to identify useful biomarkers of early renal dysfunction among human immunodeficiency virus-infected men who have sex with men exposed to tenofovir.Methods: In a cross-sectional study urinary alpha1-microglobulin, beta2-microglobulin, N-acetyl-B-n-glucosaminidase and albumin were measured and expressed as the ratio-to-creatinine in 239 human immunodeficiency virus-infected men who have sex with men who were treatment naïve or receiving antiretroviral therapy with tenofovir-containing or non-tenofovir-containing regimens. Additionally, 56 patients in the non-antiretroviral therapy group started a tenofovir-containing regimen and were assessed after 3 and 6 months on antiretroviral therapy.Results: Both the frequency of alpha1-microglobulin proteinuria (alpha1-microglobulin-creatinine ratio >25.8 mg/g) and the median urinary alpha1-microglobulin-creatinine ratio were higher in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group than the other two groups (all p< 0.05). A higher frequency of beta2-microglobulin proteinuria (beta2-microglobulin-creatinine ratio >0.68 mg/g) was also observed in the tenofovir group (28.9%) compared to the non-tenofovir group (13.6%, p= 0.024). There were no significant differences between groups for N-acetyl-β-n-glucosaminidase and albumin. In the longitudinal study, the median urinary alphat-microglobulin-creatinine ratio after 3 and 6 months on tenofovir-containing therapy (16.8 and 17.3 mg/g) was higher than baseline (12.3 mg/g, p= 0.023 and 0.011, respectively), while no statistically important changes were observed in urinary beta2-microglobulin-creatinine ratio or in the other biomarkers after 3 and 6 months on antiretroviral therapy (all p> 0.05).Conclusion: Urinary alphat-microglobulin seems to be a more sensitive and stable indicator of tubular dysfunction than urinary beta2-microglobulin for assessing tenofovir-related nephrotoxicity and can be significantly altered after tenofovir exposure.

Efficacy of Tenofovir-based Rescue Therapy for Patients with Drug-resistant Chronic Hepatitis B / 대한소화기학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) plays a pivotal role in the management of drug-resistant chronic hepatitis B. However, it remains unclear whether TDF-nucleoside analogue combination therapy provides better outcomes than TDF monotherapy. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of TDF monotherapy with that of TDF-nucleoside analogue combination therapy in patients with drug-resistant chronic hepatitis B. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 76 patients receiving TDF-based rescue therapy for more than 12 months. Suboptimal response was defined as serum HBV-DNA level of >60 IU/mL during prior rescue therapy. Multi-drug resistance was defined as the presence of two or more drug resistance-related mutations confirmed by mutation detection assay. The relationship between baseline characteristics and virologic response (HBV DNA <20 IU/mL) at 12 months were evaluated using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (72.4%) were suboptimal responders to prior rescue therapy, and 26 (34.2%) had multi-drug resistance. Forty-two patients (55.3%) received combination therapy with nucleoside analogues. Virologic response at 12 months was not significantly different between the TDF monotherapy group and TDF-nucleoside analogue combination therapy group (p=0.098). The serum HBV DNA level was reduced to -4.49+/-1.67 log10 IU/mL in the TDF monotherapy group and to -3.97+/-1.69 log10 IU/mL in the TDF-nucleoside analogue combination therapy group at 12 months (p=0.18). In multivariate analysis, female sex (p=0.032), low baseline HBV-DNA level (p=0.013), and TDF monotherapy (p=0.046) were predictive factors for virologic response at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: TDF monotherapy showed similar efficacy to that of TDF-nucleoside analogue combination therapy in patients with drug-resistant chronic hepatitis B.

Entecavir plus tenofovir versus entecavir plus adefovir in chronic hepatitis B patients with a suboptimal response to lamivudine and adefovir combination therapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We compared the efficacies of entecavir (ETV) plus tenofovir (TDF) and ETV plus adefovir (ADV) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with genotypic resistance to lamivudine (LAM) who showed a suboptimal response to LAM and ADV combination therapy. METHODS: We reviewed 63 CHB patients with genotypic resistance to LAM who showed a suboptimal response to LAM and ADV combination therapy. Among these patients, 30 were treated with ETV + ADV and 33 were treated with ETV + TDF for 12 months. RESULTS: The only baseline characteristic that differed significantly between the two groups was the ETV resistance profile. The rate of a virologic response [serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level of <20 IU/mL] was significant higher for ETV+TDF than for ETV+ADV over 12 months (57.6% vs. 23.3%, P=0.006, at 6 months; 84.8% vs. 26.7%, P<0.001, at 12 months). The probability of a virologic response was significantly increased in ETV+TDF (P<0.001, OR=54.78, 95% CI=7.15-419.54) and decreased in patients with higher baseline viral loads (P=0.001, OR=0.18, 95% CI=0.07-0.50) in multivariate analysis. No serious adverse event occurred during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CHB who showed a suboptimal response to LAM and ADV combination therapy, ETV+TDF was superior to ETV+ADV in achieving a virologic response regardless of the HBV resistance profile. Further large-scale and long-term follow-up prospective studies are needed to explain these results.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate monotherapy for nucleos(t)ide analogue-naive and nucleos(t)ide analogue-experienced chronic hepatitis B patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study investigated the antiviral effects of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) monotherapy in nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-naive and NA-experienced chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. METHODS: CHB patients treated with TDF monotherapy (300 mg/day) for > or =12 weeks between December 2012 and July 2014 at a single center were retrospectively enrolled. Clinical, biochemical, and virological parameters were assessed every 12 weeks. RESULTS: In total, 136 patients (median age 49 years, 96 males, 94 HBeAg positive, and 51 with liver cirrhosis) were included. Sixty-two patients were nucleos(t)ide (NA)-naive, and 74 patients had prior NA therapy (NA-exp group), and 31 patients in the NA-exp group had lamivudine (LAM)-resistance (LAM-R group). The baseline serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level was 4.9+/-2.3 log IU/mL (mean+/-SD), and was higher in the NA-naive group than in the NA-exp and LAM-R groups (5.9+/-2.0 log IU/mL vs 3.9+/-2.0 log IU/mL vs 4.2+/-1.7 log IU/mL, P<0.01). The complete virological response (CVR) rate at week 48 in the NA-naive group (71.4%) did not differ significantly from those in the NA-exp (71.3%) and LAM-R (66.1%) groups. In multivariate analysis, baseline serum HBV DNA was the only predictive factor for a CVR at week 48 (hazard ratio, 0.809; 95% confidence interval, 0.729-0.898), while the CVR rate did not differ with the NA experience. CONCLUSIONS: TDF monotherapy was effective for CHB treatment irrespective of prior NA treatment or LAM resistance. Baseline serum HBV DNA was the independent predictive factor for a CVR.